McCuller v. Hudson
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
{¶ 1} We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals dismissing the petition of appellant, Charles McCuller, for a writ of habeas corpus. Even assuming that the court of appeals erred in denying McCuller’s motion to amend his petition as moot, the court of appeals correctly dismissed the petition. A reviewing court will not reverse a correct judgment even if the lower court’s reasons were erroneous. Goudlock v. Voorhies, 119 Ohio St.3d 398, 2008-Ohio-4787, 894 N.E.2d 692, ¶ 12. McCuller’s claims raised in his petition and his motion to amend the petition are not cognizable in habeas corpus.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. ColonOhio Supreme Court · 2008
- Goudlock v. VoorhiesOhio Supreme Court · 2008
- Christian v. GansheimerOhio Supreme Court · 2008
3Cited by2 opinions
- Shroyer v. BanksOhio Supreme Court · 2009
- Pishok v. KellyOhio Supreme Court · 2009