Legal Opinion

McCuller v. Hudson

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 24, 2009No. 2008-1986PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals dismissing the petition of appellant, Charles McCuller, for a writ of habeas corpus. Even assuming that the court of appeals erred in denying McCuller’s motion to amend his petition as moot, the court of appeals correctly dismissed the petition. A reviewing court will not reverse a correct judgment even if the lower court’s reasons were erroneous. Goudlock v. Voorhies, 119 Ohio St.3d 398, 2008-Ohio-4787, 894 N.E.2d 692, ¶ 12. McCuller’s claims raised in his petition and his motion to amend the petition are not cognizable in habeas corpus.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. ColonOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Goudlock v. VoorhiesOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Christian v. GansheimerOhio Supreme Court · 2008

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Shroyer v. BanksOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Pishok v. KellyOhio Supreme Court · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API