Miller v. Stanich
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1DissentFowler, J.
I feel that I must record a dissent. The case is so simple that to my mind the mere statement of it proves the decision of the court wrong. The plaintiff executed to defendant a-lease in writing containing an option to defendant for a five-year extension. The premises are in Milwaukee. The plaintiff resides at Marshfield and the defendant in Milwaukee. Near the end of the term the defendant submitted to plaintiff’s agent in Milwaukee a new lease in the same terms as the original including an option for another five-year extension and asked him to procure plaintiff’s signature to it. The…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Dzuris v. PierceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
- Werner v. RawsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1892
- Crowe v. . LewinNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
- Brown v. LamphearSupreme Court of Vermont · 1862
- Frazer v. State BankSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1911
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.