Rolewitch v. Harrington
South Dakota Supreme Court
Appeal from Circuit Court, Hyde County. Hon. Loping E. Gappy, judge. Action by Louis Rolewitch and others against William M. Harrington and another. Prom a judgment for plaintiffs, defendants appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtFuller, P. J.
Pursuant to a valid contract between the real parties in interest, a well 1,600 feet deep was drilled and cased with iron tubing by plaintiffs on the farm of the defendant, William Harrington, and the ultimate question presented by this appeal is whether a mechanic’s lien for the laor and material thus used in making such improvement is within the purview of the following statutory provision: “Every mechanic, or other person wlm shall do any labor upon, or furnish any materials, machinery or fixtures for any building, erection or other improvements upon land, including those engaged in the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Bates v. HarteSupreme Court of Alabama · 1899
- Balch v. ChaffeeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1900
- Hill v. Alliance Building Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1894
- Haskell v. GallagherIndiana Court of Appeals · 1898
- Pinkerton v. Le BeauSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1893
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- John W. Tuthill Lumber Co. v. McMackinSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1913