Legal Opinion

Stryker Corp. v. Davol, Inc.

District Court, W.D. Michigan

Decided July 29, 1999No. 1:96-cr-00191PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION FINDING DEFENDANT IN CONTEMPT

McKEAGUE, District Judge.

On November 20, 1998, the jury returned a verdict in favor of plaintiff in this patent infringement action. Consistent with the verdict, judgment was entered on December 2, 1998, awarding Stryker Corporation $1,510,647 in damages and prejudgment interest. This award has subsequently been enhanced, pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 284, by the amount of $755„323.50, due to the willfulness of defendant’s infringing conduct. On December 23,1998, the Court issued a permanent injunction prohibiting further infringement by defendant…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Rite-Hite Corp. v. Kelley Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
  2. Bell Communications Research, Inc. v. Vitalink Communications CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
  3. Hoechst Celanese Corporation v. Bp Chemicals Limited and Sterling Chemicals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
  4. The Johns Hopkins University, Baxter Healthcare Corporation and Becton Dickinson and Company v. Cellpro, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
  5. Uniroyal, Inc. v. Rudkin-Wiley Corporation, Premix, Inc. v. Rudkin-Wiley CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Abbott Laboratories v. Apotex, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API