Legal Opinion

Sabah Shipyard Sdn. Bhd. v. M/V HARBEL TAPPER

District Court, S.D. Texas

Decided October 31, 1997No. CIV. A. G-95-046PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

KENT, District Judge.

This cause was tried before the Honorable Samuel B. Kent, judge presiding, without benefit of a jury, pursuant to F.R.C.P. Rule 9(h), during August 25-27, 1997. Having-considered all testimony and evidence therein presented, as well as voluminous post-trial submissions, and based upon a preponderance of the evidence, the Court hereby enters the following Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law.

FINDINGS OF FACT

I.PARTIES.

1. Plaintiff Sabah Shipyard Sdn. Bhd. (“Sabah”) is a shipyard located in Labuan, Malaysia. In 1993, Sabah purchased…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. William F. Walker, Jr., Claimants-Appellants v. Arthur E. Harris, D/B/A Arthur Harris Marine TowingCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1964
  2. Caterpillar Overseas, S.A., Libellant-Appellant v. S.S. Expeditor and American Export Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
  3. F. J. Walker, Limited, Orleans International, Inc. v. The Motor Vessel "Lemoncore," Her Engines, Etc., DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
  4. Federazione Italiana Dei Corsorzi Agrari, and v. Mandask Compania De Vapores, S.A., AndCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
  5. United States v. Ultramar Shipping Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1988

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sabah Shipyard Sdn. Bhd. v. M/V Harbel TapperCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
  2. Sabah Shipyard SDN v. M/V Harbel TapperCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
  3. Westinghouse Power v. Sabah Shipyard SDNCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API