Legal Opinion

In re Hiram G.

New York City Family Court

Decided February 17, 1984PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Frank Torres, J.

I. STATEMENT OF FACTS

Respondent herein came before this court on a delinquency petition alleging that he had been involved in acts, in concert with others, that if committed by an adult would constitute the crimes of criminal mischief in the third degree (Penal Law, § 145.05) burglary in the third degree (Penal Law, § 140.20) and criminal trespass in the third degree (Penal Law, § 140.10).

At the fact finding, respondent made an admission to violation of section 140.10 of the Penal Law (criminal trespass, third degree) in that he had been inside…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re CluesoNew York City Family Court · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API