Legal Opinion

Harvey v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided January 23, 1979No. 40316PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

CRIST, Judge.

Movant appeals the denial of his Rule 27.26 Motion after an evidentiary hearing with appointed counsel. We affirm.

Movant claims he was denied effective assistance of counsel because his attorney coerced him into pleading guilty. He seeks to have his guilty pleas on four counts of armed robbery and concurrent fifteen year sentences vacated.

Our inquiry is the extent to which counsel’s actions affected the voluntariness of the pleas. Haynes v. State, 565 S.W.2d 191 (Mo.App.1978). Movant testified that his attorney sought to have him plead guilty because “they had too much evidence…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Haynes v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. White v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. Wright v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977
  4. Shepherd v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Troupe v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API