Legal Opinion

Serrill v. Hilderbrand

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 9, 1979No. 79-1489PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RYDER, Judge.

Serrill seeks common law certiorari to review the order of a medical mediation panel finding respondent Hilderbrand not actionably negligent in his care and treatment of her. Petitioner contends that since a final hearing on the merits of her claim was not commenced within 180 days of filing, jurisdiction of the panel had terminated.1 We agree and grant the petition for certiorari.

Petitioner filed her claim against the respondent on October 13, 1978, pursuant to Section 768.44(l)(a), Fla.Stat. (1977). Thereafter, as permitted by Section 768.-44(3), the judicial referee extended…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Green v. BROWARD GENERAL MEDICAL CTR.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978
  2. Raedel v. Watson Clinic Foundation, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978
  3. Hewitt v. CaffeeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
  4. Stanton v. COMMUNITY HOSP. OF SOUTH BROWARDDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978
  5. Hirsch v. KleinmanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Roberts v. CaseyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  2. Roberts v. CaseyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API