Legal Opinion
Armour Pharmaceutical Company, a Delaware Corporation v. Richardson-Merrell, Inc., a Delaware Ware Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided May 17, 1968No. 16779PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
BIGGS, Circuit Judge.
The plaintiff-appellee Armour Pharmaceutical Company (Armour) brought suit against defendant Richardson-Merrell, Inc. (RM) seeking a declaratory judgment of invalidity and non-infringement of United States Patent з, 004,893 (’93) issued to Dr. Gustav J. Martin and assigned to R. M. 1 *Upon cross motions for summary judgment the District Court, basing its decision on stipulations, depositions, interrogatories and a hearing found the patent invalid for want of invention and entered summary judgment for Armour. 2 RM appeals from that judgment.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Funk Bros. Seed Co. v. Kalo Inoculant Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Le Roy v. TathamSupreme Court of the United States · 1853
- Davison Chemical Corp. v. Joliet Chemicals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1950
- National Lead Company v. Western Lead Products CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
- Lawler v. James H.Supreme Court of the United States · 1852
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. Robert P. Marchand, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
- Deep Welding, Inc. v. Sciaky Bros., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1969
- Mobil Oil Corporation v. WR Grace & CompanyDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1973
- United States v. Robert P. Marchand, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978