Legal Opinion

Ford v. Conklin

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided February 22, 2001No. SC96152PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtQuince, J.

We have for review a decision on the following question of great public importance certified by the First District Court of Appeal in Conklin v. Ford, 737 So.2d 602 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999):

WHERE AN EMPLOYER TAKES A WORKERS’ COMPENSATION OFFSET UNDER SECTION 440.20(15), FLORIDA STATUTES (1985), AND INITIALLY INCLUDES SUPPLEMENTAL BENEFITS PAID UNDER SECTION 440.15(l)(e)l, FLORIDA STATUTES (1985), IS THE EMPLOYER ENTITLED TO RECALCULATE THE OFFSET BASED ON THE YEARLY 5% INCREASE IN SUPPLEMENTAL BENEFITS?

We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. For the reasons expressed in City of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. City of Clearwater v. AckerSupreme Court of Florida · 1999
  2. Conklin v. FordDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Herzfeld v. HerzfeldSupreme Court of Florida · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API