Legal Opinion
Staacke v. Routledge
Texas Supreme Court
Decided May 3, 1922No. 2847PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Cureton
This suit was instituted by the defendant in error against the . Rambler Automobile Company, a corporation, to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by him on April 25, 1905, by reason of the negligence of an employee of the corporation in the operation of an automobile owned by it, in which defendant in error was riding. The case was tried and judgment rendered for the Company; which judgment, however, was reversed by the Court of Civil Appeals at San Antonio. See 95 S. W., 749.
Defendant in error then amended his petition, and in addition to the original…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Cowell v. Springs Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Railroad Co. v. EllermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Briscoe v. BronaughTexas Supreme Court · 1846
- Fitzhugh v. Franco-Texas Land Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1891
- Bond v. Terrell Cotton & Woolen Manufacturing Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1891
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Atomic Fuel Extraction Corporation v. Slick's EstateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964
- Gearhart Industries, Inc. v. Smith International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
- Sutton v. Reagan & GeeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966
- Guadalupe-Blanco River Authority v. City of San AntonioTexas Supreme Court · 1947
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 91,667 Gearhart Industries, Inc., Cross v. Smith International, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, Third Party Cross v. Texas American/fort Worth N.A., Trustee, Third Party DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.