Legal Opinion
Thomas v. Wyckoff
Supreme Court of Iowa
Decided September 26, 1919PublishedCited by 1 opinion
Appeal from Wapello District Court. — Francis M. Hunter, Judge. The plaintiff has verdict and judgment for a commission he claims to have earned in making or promoting the sale of a farm owned by appellant J. L. Wyckoff. Defendants appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtSalinger, J.
I.. Lyons, the purchaser, was asked:
“The fact that Mr. Thomas stated to you that he would not buy the farm, it was full of gulleys, and things of that kind, led you to believe that you would not buy the place?”
1. asm,: evidence: This was objected to as leading, immaterial, and incompetent, and a question for the jury. The objection was sustained, and the ruling is assigned as error. It seems to us that the question was leading, and that we need not go beyond saying this in refusing to reverse upon this assignment.
II. Lyons was asked:
“Well, then, there was not anything said or done by Mr.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Rounds v. AleeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
- Metcalf v. KentSupreme Court of Iowa · 1898
- Larson v. ThomaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
- Kelly v. StoneSupreme Court of Iowa · 1895
- Fenton v. MillerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1912
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. ErbSupreme Court of Iowa · 1947