Legal Opinion

Lehman v. Fischzang

Civil Court of the City of New York

Decided November 23, 1966PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAlvin F. Klein, J.

The controversy involved in the within action has been submitted to the court for determination upon an agreed statement of facts, pursuant to CPLK. 3222.

In brief the facts are: Plaintiff, Jean Lehman, turned over to the defendant a man’s ring which was to be converted into a lady’s dinner ring. Thereafter the work was completed and the ring was picked up on November 9, 1960 by Jean Lehman, the plaintiff. At the time the plaintiff picked up the ring, defendant gave her a written appraisal on the ring in the sum of $1,500. About two weeks later, this plaintiff returned the ring to the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Miller v. . HarveyNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
  2. Sagendorph v. First National Bank of PhilmontAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926
  3. Polack v. O'BrienAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
  4. Fire Ass'n of Philadelphia v. FabianRochester City Court · 1938

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Maryland Casualty Co. v. DelzerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Morgenstern v. Eastman Kodak Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1983
  3. Ikegwuoha v. Art Village GalleryDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API