Legal Opinion

Crowell v. Police Board

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided September 18, 1975No. 60677PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Dempsey

William Crowell, a policeman with 17 years’ experience was found guilty by the Chicago Police Roard of violating the following rule of the Chicago Police Department:

“Rule 2. Any action or conduct which impedes the Department’s efforts to achieve its goals or brings discredit on the Department.”

The board’s decision was upheld by the Circuit Court and Crowell has pursued his appeal here, contending that the court was in error in not finding that the decision of the board was against the manifest weight of the evidence.

The charge against Crowell arose from his conduct while he was under…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Coursey v. Board Fire & Police Com'rs of SkokieAppellate Court of Illinois · 1967
  2. Kelly v. POLICE BD. OF CHICAGOAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975
  3. Schnulle v. Board of Fire & Police CommissionersAppellate Court of Illinois · 1974
  4. Avent v. Police Board of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1964
  5. Ceja v. State Police Merit BoardAppellate Court of Illinois · 1973

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Department of Mental Health & Developmental Disabilities v. Civil Service CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Kreiser v. Police BoardAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976
  3. Crowell v. BilandicIllinois Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Caliendo v. GoodrichAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975
  5. Brown v. SexnerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API