Legal Opinion

Kiley v. Lubelsky

District Court, D. South Carolina

Decided August 20, 1970No. Civ. A. No. 69-985PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

HEMPHILL, District Judge.

This is a wrongful death case in which plaintiff, claiming to be administratrix of the estate of a deceased child, brought suit for the child’s wrongful death. The amended complaint, filed February 2, 1970, specifically states that plaintiff “brings this action under the provisions of Section 10-19511 et seq. for the benefit of the parents of the said deceased * * Not pertinent to a decision at this time, but of interest, are allegations that on February 8, 1964, the deceased was playing on premises adjacent to Mama Kate’s Drive-In, that Orkin had come on that…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Graves v. WelbornSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  3. In Re Estate of MayoSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1901
  4. Bennett v. North Carolina RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  5. Glenn v. E. I. DuPont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1970

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Beal v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Beal for Martinez v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Castle v. Lockwood-MacDonald HospitalMichigan Court of Appeals · 1972
  4. Fisher v. Volkswagenwerk AktiengesellschaftMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. Rennie v. PozziOregon Supreme Court · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API