Legal Opinion

Godwin v. . Jernigan

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 19, 1917PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal by defendant from Stacy, J., at February Special Term, 1917, of HaRNETT.

1Opinion of the CourtClark, C. J.

Tbis cause was tried in tbe recorder’s court of Dunn. •On appeal, there was a compulsory reference. On tbe filing of tbe referee’s report, 8 November, 1915, exceptions were filed by tbe defendant thereto, but no issues were formulated to secure a jury trial, as required under our practice. Driller Co. v. Worth, 117 N. C., 515; Ogden v. Land Co., 146 N. C., 443. On 16 June, 1916, tbe defendant filed tbe issues, but without leave of court. Tbis was too late.

Upon the bearing of the exceptions to the referee’s report at February Term, 1917, the defendant demurred ore tenus, and for the first…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Keystone Driller Co. v. WorthSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
  2. Hocutt v. Wilmington & Weldon R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1899
  3. Ogden v. Appalachian Land & Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
  4. Cooper v. Southern Express Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  5. Theo. A. Kochs Co. v. JacksonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Silver Valley Mining v. . Baltimore SmeltingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888
  2. Sheffield v. . AlexanderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API