Legal Opinion · Dissent

Arora v. Chui

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 26, 1996No. 2-95-0051Published

1Dissent

PRESIDING JUSTICE McLAREN,

dissenting:

MALICIOUS PROSECUTION

The law of Illinois, inter alia, is that there must be a "favorable termination” in order to plead properly a cause of action recognized in this State as malicious prosection.

I submit that a reasoned review of Illinois case law establishes that a "favorable termination” can typically occur in two situations: first, a trial or hearing "on the merits” which is terminated in the plaintiffs favor; second, a termination of the proceedings, not "on the merits,” but with sufficient facts alleged to indicate that, if there were a trial or…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Meerbrey v. Marshall Field & Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Swick v. LiautaudIllinois Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Joiner v. Benton Community BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Swager v. CouriIllinois Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Schwartz v. SchwartzIllinois Supreme Court · 1937

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API