Legal Opinion
Dowling v. Crabtree
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided March 1, 1999No. Civil 98-1057-HAPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
HAGGERTY, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
The petitioner, Roger Dowling, is an inmate at the Federal Correctional Institution (“FCI”) at Sheridan, Oregon. The respondent, Joseph H. Crabtree, is the Warden of FCI at Sheridan and is inmate petitioner’s custodian and the proper respondent in this action. Fed.R.Civ.P. 81(a)(2); Brittingham v. United States, 982 F.2d 378, 379 (9th Cir.1992).
Dowling has filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241, contending that his statutory and due process rights are being violated by the Federal Bureau of Prisons’s…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Mark Brittingham v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Lazy Fc RanchCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
- Charles A. Johnson v. J. Williford, Warden, Metropolitan Correctional Center United States Parole Commission and United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Cort v. CrabtreeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Carl Marquis Maddox v. J. WadasDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2026