McCready v. Lindenborn

The case ás settled, after stating that certain plans were received in evidence and marked-“ Defendant’s Exhibit 6,” contains the requirement “ here insert same.” Instead of printing *607the exhibit as directed, the appellant’s counsel, on his own responsibility, omitted the words “ here insert same ” as ¡well as the exhibit, and in lieu thereof printed the following: “ The plans bearing the stenographer’s mark not having been produced, although demanded, the appellant has been unable to print the same or reproduce copies thereof. They are supposed to be similar to defendant’s Exhibits 17, 18, 19…