Legal Opinion
Prus v. Holder
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided September 28, 2011No. Docket 10-599-agPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Per curiam
Petitioner Oksana Nikolayevna Prus was convicted in New York for promoting prostitution in the third degree. The Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) found her removable, concluding that her offense constituted an aggravated felony under the Immigration and Nationality Act (“INA”) § 101(a)(43)(K)(i), 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(43)(K)(i). Prus seeks review of the BIA’s order declining to reconsider whether she had been convicted of an aggravated felony and dismissing her appeal from an order of removal. Prus argues that her offense does not constitute an aggravated felony because New York law defines…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Gustafson v. Alloyd Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Athanasios Theodoropoulos v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- Mizrahi v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
- Durant Blake, A/K/A Terrel Carner, A/K/A Durant Stanley v. Alberto Gonzales, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
- Kamagate v. AshcroftCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Akinsade v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
- MacTaggart v. LynchCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015
- United States v. SchillerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2023
- Kondjoua v. BarrCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2020
- Akinsade v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.