Rosen v. Albert

OPINION

By WATTERS, J.

This matter comes before the court upon the motion of the defendant, Sidney L. Albert, without entering his appearance, attacking the jurisdiction of the court (this branch) entering judgment upon a cognovit note, November 20, 1959, in favor of the plaintiff, Carl Rosen.

Defendant claims that the warrant of attorney in said note upon which the judgment was entered is too broad, and, in fact, does not authorize judgment in the State of Ohio.

It is conceded by the plaintiff that if the warrant of attorney is in fact invalid under the laws of Ohio, then said judgment rendered…