Baldwin v. Clock
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Monroe. (Morris, J.) Assumpsit. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.
Plaintiff, as survivor of the law firm of himself and Anderson Wing, practicing in Monroe, sued defendant for legal services rendered in connection with defendant’s claim against a railway company for damaging his land in Toledo, Ohio. Plaintiff recovered $40, the amount of his claim for firm services, but did not recover the sum of 825 claimed for the value of retaining Warner Wing as counsel. Defendant appealed, and in the circuit the plaintiff recovered nothing, and assigns errors for misdirection of the circuit judge.
Plaintiff made out by his own testimony a full case show*202ing his own…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Brenton Bros. & Leach v. HillSupreme Court of Iowa · 1924
- American Railway Express Co. v. ReadyMichigan Supreme Court · 1925
- Frye v. MielkeMichigan Supreme Court · 1934