Legal Opinion

Smith v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided July 18, 1984No. 666-83PublishedCited by 115 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

McCORMICK, Judge.

On original submission to the Dallas Court of Appeals the appellant raised two grounds of error. In his first ground of error, appellant argued that the trial court erred in failing to submit a jury instruction on the law of self-defense. In his second ground of error, he argued that the evidence was insufficient to show that the knife was used as a “deadly weapon”. The Court of Appeals in an unpublished opinion affirmed appellant’s conviction finding that the evidence as to a “deadly weapon” was sufficient and also…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Dyson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
  2. Booth v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
  3. Rodriquez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1976
  4. Dominguez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
  5. Barree v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981

3Cited by115 opinions

  1. Nethery v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  2. Juarez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2010
  3. Davis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2008
  4. VanBrackle v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2005
  5. Boget v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2001

110 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API