Legal Opinion

Buntin v. Hooper

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1877PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Erom the Knox Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

"Worden, J.

— In this case there is a motion made by

-the appellees to dismiss the appeal, on the ground that the same was not taken within the time prescribed by -the statute. The appellant has had due notice of the motion.

A motion for a new trial in the cause was made and overruled on the 2d day of J une, 1877, before which time judgment seems to have been rendered.

The transcript of the record was filed in this court on July 13th, 1878. The appeal, therefore, was not taken within the time limited.

Section 561 of the code was amended by the 2d section of the act of March 14th, 1877, Acts 1877,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Jehiel Brooks, in Error v. Samuel NorrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1851

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Holloran v. Midland Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Miller v. CarmichaelIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Glassburn v. DeerIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. BolandIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
  5. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago R. W. Co. v. JacksonIndiana Supreme Court · 1878

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API