Cary v. Brown

WESTERFIELD, Judge.

This is a suit by a contractor against the owner of a building based upon a contract for the remodelling of the interior of the building, in which the sum of $174.85 is demanded. Plaintiff’s claim is resisted upon the ground that his work was defective. Defendant reconvened, claiming $195 based upon the alleged loss of rentals caused by the delay in the preparation of the building, said to be due to plaintiff’s breach of the contract.

There was judgment below in favor of plaintiff in the sum of $149.85 and dismissing the reconventional demand. The defendant has appealed and…