Legal Opinion

Watkins v. Freeway Motors

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided April 2, 1997No. 29385-CAPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

691 So.2d 854 (1997)

Mabel T. WATKINS, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

FREEWAY MOTORS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 29385-CA.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Second Circuit.

April 2, 1997.

G. Ali Moghimi, in pro. per.

L. Douglas Lawrence, Monroe, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Before MARVIN, WILLIAMS and STEWART, JJ.

WILLIAMS, Judge.

The defendant, Freeway Motors, appeals a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, Mabel Watkins. The trial court found that redhibitory defects in the automobiles required rescission of the transaction executed by the parties and return of the purchase price. For the following reasons, we affirm.

FACTS

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Carroll v. ColemanLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1996
  2. Savannah v. Anthony's Auto Sales, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1993
  3. Dupree-Simpson Farms v. HELENA CHEMICALLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1996
  4. Morvant v. Himel Marine, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1988
  5. Sikes v. B & S Supply, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1964

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Morris v. United Services Auto. Ass'nLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2000
  2. Johnson v. CHL ENTERPRISESDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 2000
  3. Davis v. European MotorsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2017
  4. Jackson v. European Serv., Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API