Legal Opinion
Kellogg v. Travis
New York Supreme Court
Decided May 18, 2001PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Richard F. Braun, J.
This is an action for a declaratory judgment to declare Executive Law § 995 (7), as amended, unconstitutional as applied to plaintiff and others similarly situated, and to order that defendant Katherine N. Lapp return to plaintiff his blood samples, DNA record, and reports based thereon, and retrieve and turn over to plaintiff all such blood samples, his DNA record, and reports distributed to any other agency or facility, such as the Federal Bureau of Investigation or local law enforcement agencies. Defendants move to dismiss the verified complaint,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Collins v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- United States v. UrserySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- In re D.L.C.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2003
- State v. NormanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
- Lunney v. GoordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Kellogg v. TravisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- People v. AfrikaNew York Supreme Court · 2001
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.