Thompson v. State

The order of revocation of probation and the judgment and sentence predicated thereon are affirmed. The provision in the sentence that appellant be confined “at hard labor” is surplusage and the same is hereby stricken. Massey v. State, 351 So.2d 376 (Fla.1st DCA 1977). Further, the provision in the sentence that appellant, who had been adjudged insolvent, pay costs of- $2.00 or serve one day of confinement to run concurrently with the sentence was error. Smith v. State, 352 So.2d 1276 (Fla.1st DCA 1977). As amended, the judgment and sentence are affirmed except for the assessment of costs…