Legal Opinion

People v. Dusablon

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 10, 1965PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVan Voorhis, J.

Section 1045-a of the Penal Law is not ex post facto, nor was it error to have received nonlegal evidence at the trial determining punishment (People ex rel. Lonschein [Mencher] v. Warden of Queens House of Detention, 15 N Y 2d 663; 43 Misc 2d 109). The former crimes committed by appellants could constitutionally have been considered by a sentencing Judge as germane to probation reports (Williams v. New York, 337 U. S. 241), and, as pointed out in Lonschein, section 1045-a of the Penal Law merely substitutes a jury for a Judge in imposing sentence in this situation. The criminal records of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Williams v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  4. People v. . MolineuxNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
  5. People ex rel. Lonschein v. Warden of Queens House of Detention for MenNew York Supreme Court · 1964

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. LaValleNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
  2. People v. LaValleNew York Court of Appeals · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API