People v. Dusablon
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtVan Voorhis, J.
Section 1045-a of the Penal Law is not ex post facto, nor was it error to have received nonlegal evidence at the trial determining punishment (People ex rel. Lonschein [Mencher] v. Warden of Queens House of Detention, 15 N Y 2d 663; 43 Misc 2d 109). The former crimes committed by appellants could constitutionally have been considered by a sentencing Judge as germane to probation reports (Williams v. New York, 337 U. S. 241), and, as pointed out in Lonschein, section 1045-a of the Penal Law merely substitutes a jury for a Judge in imposing sentence in this situation. The criminal records of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Williams v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- People v. . MolineuxNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
- People ex rel. Lonschein v. Warden of Queens House of Detention for MenNew York Supreme Court · 1964
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- People v. LaValleNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
- People v. LaValleNew York Court of Appeals · 2004