Legal Opinion

Knorr v. Knorr

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 23, 1988No. 256PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WIEAND, Judge:

The sole issue in this appeal is whether a court may reduce the amount of a prior order for the support of two children because of changed circumstances where the amount of the initial order was based upon an agreement between the children’s mother and father. We hold that a court can modify its own order. Therefore, we reverse and remand to permit the trial court to receive evidence and determine whether appellant’s changed financial circumstances warrant a reduction in the amount of the order.

Marlene and Michael Knorr were married on April 26, 1978. They had two children:…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Sonder v. SonderSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  2. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Magaziner v. MagazinerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  3. Brown v. HallSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Silvestri v. SlatowskiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  5. Millstein v. MillsteinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Nicholson v. CombsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  2. Knorr v. KnorrSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  3. Lipschutz v. LipschutzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  4. Nessa v. NessaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  5. Van Dyke v. Van DykeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API