Legal Opinion

City of Wakarusa v. Holdeman

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 12, 1991No. 20S03-9112-CV-983PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON PETITION TO TRANSFER

KRAHULIK, Justice.

The City of Wakarusa and Ken Miller (Defendants-Appellants below) seek transfer after the Court of Appeals affirmed the denial of summary judgment in their favor and against Monte Holdeman (Plaintiff-Appellee below). City of Wakarusa v. Holdeman (1990), Ind.App., 560 N.E.2d 109.

The question in this case is whether immunity under the Indiana Tort Claims Act is conferred when a deputy marshal, while on patrol for license plate violations, hits another vehicle. We hold that the deputy was not “enforcing a law” within the meaning of Ind.Code Ann. §…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Seymour National Bank v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Seymour National Bank v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Tittle v. MahanIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
  4. City of Wakarusa v. HoldemanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1990

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Quakenbush v. LackeyIndiana Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Tittle v. MahanIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Quakenbush v. LackeyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. City of Valparaiso v. EdgecombIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Fries v. FincherIndiana Court of Appeals · 1993

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API