Legal Opinion · Concurrence

In re Petition of CSX Transp., Inc.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 1, 2010No. 2010-0127Published

1ConcurrencePfeifer, J.

{¶ 3} I concur in the decision to dismiss the appeal but write separately to emphasize that dual filing requirements should be abolished. A. Schulman, Inc. v. Wilkins, 112 Ohio St.3d 1208, 2006-Ohio-6677, 859 N.E.2d 553, ¶ 6 (Pfeifer, J., dissenting). They serve no useful purpose. Olympic Steel, Inc. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision, 110 Ohio St.3d 1242, 2006-Ohio-4091, 852 N.E.2d 178 (Pfeifer, J., dissenting). Dual filing requirements are a trap for attorneys operating outside their normal area of practice. Prosecuting attorneys are not normally expert in the procedures associated with…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Olympic Steel, Inc. v. Cuyahoga County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  2. A. Schulman, Inc. v. WilkinsOhio Supreme Court · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API