Curry v. Marquart
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMatthias, J.
The services' to be performed by the defendants were not unique or extraordinary personal services or of such character as to require special knowledge, skill or ability. On the contrary, upon default the same service could readily be obtained from others. It is quite apparent, therefore, that for the damages suffered as a result of the failure of the defendants to perform the contract in question plaintiff has' an adequate remedy 'at law; in fact, has pursued it.
The only question before the court is whether injunction will lie to restrain defendants from “soliciting, gathering or hauling…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Fulton Grand Laundry Co. v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1922
3Cited by20 opinions
- Briggs v. ButlerOhio Supreme Court · 1942
- Wiebold Studio, Inc. v. Old World Restorations, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1985
- Sanitary Farm Dairies, Inc. v. WolfSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
- W. R. Grace & Co. v. HargadineCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1968
- Al Minor & Associates, Inc. v. MartinOhio Supreme Court · 2008
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.