Legal Opinion

Briesen v. A Certain Fund

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided January 5, 1925No. 4101PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal from a final decree of the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia, dismissing a bill of complaint filed by the appellants, as plaintiffs, against the Alien Property Custodian, under section 9 of the Trading with the Enemy Act (Comp. St. § 3U6%e).

It appears that the Schmidt’sche Ileiss-dampf Gesellsehaft, a German corporation, was the owner of a majority of the capital stock of the Locomotive Superheater Company, an American corporation, whose principal offices were in the city of New York, and that in the year 1911 the former company entered into a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Jellenik v. Huron Copper Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1900
  2. National Bank v. Watsontown BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  3. Kahn v. GarvanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1920
  4. In the Matter of the Woven Tape Skirt Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1881
  5. Rockwood v. MillerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1923

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. (PC) Puckett v. CatlinDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API