Legal Opinion

Royal Mink Ranch v. Ralston Purina Co.

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided October 17, 1969No. Docket 4,621PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolbrook, J.

Plaintiff Boyal Mink Banch, a Michigan corporation, acting through its owner, Mrs. Josie Chaddock, brought this action for damages allegedly caused by feeding plaintiff’s mink a cereal manufactured by defendant, Balston Purina Company and distributed by defendant Wickes Corporation. The feed was claimed by plaintiff to be contaminated, nutritionally deficient, negligently prepared and improperly stored.

• Mrs. Chaddock’s husband, Dr. Theodore' Ch'ad: dock, is a veterinarianj practicing his profession in the Saginaw area where plaintiff’s mink tanch is *698located. Dr. Chaddock was also concerned…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Murchie v. Standard Oil CompanyMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Savage v. Peterson Distributing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Bauer v. VeithMichigan Supreme Court · 1964
  4. O'Donnell v. Oliver Iron Mining Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Bujalski v. Metzler Motor Sales Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1958

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Keefer v. C R Bard, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. Lopez v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. Thorp v. Dayton Tire & Rubber Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1974
  4. Carr v. City of DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973
  5. Keefer v. C R Bard, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API