Legal Opinion

Cherry v. Town of Hampton Falls

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided April 16, 2004No. 2003-121PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBroderick, C. J.

The defendants, Town of Hampton Falls and Hampton Falls Planning Board (planning board), appeal an order of the Superior Court (McHugh, J.) ruling that the planning board’s denial of an application for a subdivision submitted by the plaintiffs, Ernest M. Cherry, Jr. and Carole A. Cherry, was unlawful and unreasonable. We reverse.

The record supports the following facts. In April 2002, the plaintiffs submitted an application to the planning board to subdivide 84.5 acres of land in Hampton Falls into twenty-five individual lots. The application was later amended to include only nineteen…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Richmond Co. v. City of ConcordSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
  2. Exeter Hospital Medical Staff v. Board of Trustees of Exeter Health Resources, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2002
  3. NBAC Corp. v. Town of WeareSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2001
  4. Saturley v. Town of HollisSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1987

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Motorsports Holdings, LLCSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2007
  2. DHB, Inc. v. Town of PembrokeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
  3. Boulders at Strafford, LLC v. Town of StraffordSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2006
  4. Lakeside Lodge, Inc. v. Town of New LondonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2008
  5. Motorsports Holdings, LLC v. Town of TamworthSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API