Legal Opinion

(SS) Madrigal Barraza v. Commissioner of Social Security

District Court, E.D. California

Decided June 12, 2025No. 1:21-cv-00790Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ALICIA MADRIGAL BARRAZA, Case No. 1:21-cv-0790 JLT BAM 12 Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING THE FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS; DENYING 13 PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY v. JUDGMENT; GRANTING DEFENDANT’S 14 REQUEST TO AFFIRM; AND DIRECTING FRANK BISIGNANO, ENTRY OF JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF 15 Commissioner of Social Security,1 DEFENDANT FRANK BIGSIGNANO, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, 16 Defendant. AND AGAINST PLAINTIFF ALICIA MADRIGAL BARRAZA 17 (Docs. 20, 24, 26) 18 Alicia Madrigal Barraza initiated this action seeking…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gavin Buck v. Nancy BerryhillCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  2. Shaibi v. BerryhillCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  3. Rossetti v. CurranCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
  4. Entergy Services, Inc. v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API