Legal Opinion

Seem v. Henry

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lehigh County

Decided March 24, 1930No. 3Published

1Opinion of the Court

Reno, P. J.,

William H. Seem filed a bill in equity, alleging that W. R. Henry, for the purpose of securing water power to operate his grist mill, keeps and maintains a dam near the William H. Seem *491boundary line across the natural channel of the Little Lehigh River, which obstructs the natural flow of the water of the Little Lehigh River and dams it to such a height as to overflow its banks, thereby hindering and delaying plaintiff in harvesting his crops with teams and machinery and injuring said crops. He prays for equitable relief as follows: (1) That the defendant be decreed to raise said…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Garrett v. JacksonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1853
  2. Hudson v. WatsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1897
  3. McGeorge v. Hoffman, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Delaware County1890

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API