Legal Opinion
In Re Grand Jury Subpoena Served Upon Crown Video Unlimited, Inc.
District Court, E.D. North Carolina
Decided February 4, 1986PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
TERRENCE WILLIAM BOYLE, District Judge.
The United States of America appeals from an order issued by a United States Magistrate. That order quashed a portion of a subpoena duces tecum issued in relation to a grand jury investigation. The subpoenaed parties treat the Magistrate’s order as a Memorandum and Recommendation and have timely filed objections thereto. The court will treat the order as a Memorandum and Recommendation and considers the Government’s appeal as constituting objections to that Memorandum and Recommendation.
I
During the course of a grand jury investigation, the United…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Alabama Ex Rel. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Fisher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Hale v. HenkelSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Pinter v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- Biller v. LopesDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1987
- In Re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Served Upon PHE, Inc.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1992
- Bean LLC v. John Doe BankCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Pattison Bros. Mississippi River Terminal, Inc. v. Iowa District Court for Clayton CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 2001
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.