Legal Opinion
M.W. Daman and V.A. Daman v. Com.
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided October 16, 2017No. 1009 F.R. 2013Published
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY SENIOR JUDGE PELLEGRINI
Mark W. Daman and Valerie A. Daman (Taxpayers) petition pro se for review of an order of the Board of Finance and Revenue (Board) granting in part and denying in part their appeal from a determination of the Department of Revenue (Department) Board of Appeals (BOA), and disallowing the majority of their claimed $38,150.00 in unreimbursed employee business expenses 1 for tax year 2010, and determining that a tax of $1,089.00 plus penalties and interest was due. For the reasons that follow, we quash.
On April 15, 2011, Taxpayers filed a timely joint 2010…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Commissioner v. FlowersSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Commonwealth v. SpontarelliCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Boniella v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- Earl Curtis v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
- A. J. Michel, Jr. And Raymonde A. Michel v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.