Legal Opinion

Palmer v. Fagerlin

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 11, 1910No. Docket No. 93PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Error to Montcalm; Davis, J. Assumpsit in justice’s court by Lucian 0. Palmer against Peter Fagerlin and Fred W. Johnson. A judgment for plaintiff, on appeal to the circuit court, is reviewed by defendant Fagerlin on writ of error.

1Opinion of the CourtBrooke, J.

This is an action in which plaintiff seeks to recover the sum of $40 and interest; that being the amount of a promissory note given by defendant to plaintiff.

It appears that Ada E. Fagerlin, wife of defendant, had on August 12, 19,08, filed a bill of complaint for a divorce against her husband, plaintiff herein acting as her solicitor. On August 26, 1908, the husband, defendant herein, caused his appearance in said cause to be entered *346by Frank A. Miller as his solicitor. On September 3, 1908, Fagerlinf his wife, and her solicitor, had a conference for the purpose of adjusting their property…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Randall v. RandallMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
  2. Owen v. YaleMichigan Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Maisch v. MaischSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1913
  2. In re Berner's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Kline v. KlineMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979
  4. Miller v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1943
  5. Emery v. EmeryMichigan Supreme Court · 1914

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API