International Insurance Co. v. Archuleta
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion
ON MOTION FOR REHEARING
Both parties have filed motions for rehearing. We first consider the claimant’s motion.
The argument is made that her pleading for total and permanent benefits authorized the submission of the lesser amounts for partial and permanent benefits. She also asserts she can recover on the basis of the Appellant’s pleading that her incapacity, if any, “is not total and permanent but was and is partial and temporary.” Argument is also made that we have misconstrued the holding in Select Insurance Company v. Boucher, 561 S.W.2d 474 (Tex.1978). But, such argument does not touch…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Select Insurance Co. v. BoucherTexas Supreme Court · 1978
- Texas Employers' Ins. Ass'n v. TateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1948
- Stone v. TEXAS EMPLOYERS'INSURANCE ASSOCIATIONTexas Supreme Court · 1954
- Burns v. Union Standard Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1980
- Employers' Reinsurance Corp. v. BrantleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1943
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.