Legal Opinion

Fitts v. Becker

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1901Published

Action by Mary C. Fitts and others against Bertha E. Becker. Judgment for plaintiffs. Motion by defendant to vacate an order adjudging her guilty of contempt, and fining her in the sum of $1,200.

1Opinion of the CourtChilds, J.

From the papers submitted on this motion it appears that an order for the examination of Bertha E. Becker, the judgment debtor herein, in proceedings supplementary to execution, was duly made on the 19th day of September, 1901, by the county judge of Cattaraugus county, and thereafter, and on the 20th day of September, then instant, duly served upon the said judgment debtor, which order contained the usual provisions forbidding the judgment debtor to transfer, dispose of, or in any manner interfere with any property belonging to her, or in which she has any interest. Before the service of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Rodman v. . HenryNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
  2. Teller v. RandallNew York Supreme Court · 1862
  3. Krone v. KlotzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
  4. Crounse v. WhippleNew York Supreme Court · 1865
  5. Gerton Carriage Co. v. RichardsonNew York Supreme Court · 1894

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API