Legal Opinion
Beck v. Test Masters Educational Services, Inc.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided December 18, 2013No. Civil Action No. 2004-1391Published
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Royce C. Lamberth, U.S. District Judge
Before the Court is the defendant’s renewed motion for sanctions against the plaintiffs and/or their attorneys. For the reasons stated below, defendant’s motion for sanctions will be DENIED.
I. BACKGROUND
The relevant facts are as'follows: hoping to attend law school beginning in the fall of 2004, plaintiffs Jarrod Beck, Keerthi Reddy, and Erin Galloway signed up for an LSAT prep course with defendant, Test Masters Educational Services, Inc. (“TES”). Plaintiffs claim that they believed they were signing up with TestMas-ters, a company…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Lashawn A. v. Marion S. Barry, Jr.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Melvin D. Wallace and Arthur M. LevinCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992
- Steinert v. Winn Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.