Legal Opinion · Dissent

City of Pocatello v. Peterson

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided August 7, 1970No. 10646Published

1DissentMcFADDEN, Chief Justice

The majority opinion deals solely with the issue as to what constitutes “ordinary' and necessary expenses” within the proviso clause of Idaho Const, art. 8, § 3. It concludes that “the funds to be expended by the City of Pocatello for the repair arid improvement of its airport facility are ‘ordinary and necessary expenses’ incurred by the municipality, falling within the proviso to Article 8, § 3 of the Idaho Constitution. Furthermore the repair and improvement of the Pocatello airport facility is essential for the proper growth and development of the area.”

At the outset it is to be noted…

2Cases cited62 opinions

  1. City of Phoenix v. KolodziejskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. McBean v. City of FresnoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Book v. State Office Building CommissionIndiana Supreme Court · 1958
  4. McArthur v. SmallwoodSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1955
  5. Kelley v. EarleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API