Legal Opinion

Caruso v. Dry Dock Savings Institution

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 12, 1939PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcLaughlin, J.

Two motions are before the court; one is made by the plaintiff for summary judgment, and the other, which is a cross-motion, is made by the defendant for similar relief. The action is one brought by the plaintiff to recover the amount of a savings bank account. The account was a joint account standing in the names of Tony Caruso, the plaintiff, or Mary Caruso, his daughter, or survivor. It seems that the plaintiff and his daughter quarrelled, and that when she left him she took the bank book with her. While apparently she is still in the city of New York, *868nevertheless, she is in hiding so far…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Grafing v. Irving Savings InstitutionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Finkelberg v. LuckettMississippi Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Laurent v. Williamsburgh Savings BankNew York Supreme Court · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API