Legal Opinion

Tidwell v. Berke

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1975PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HARBISON, Justice.

This suit was instituted by appellee, Harry Berke, for a declaratory judgment and for recovery of certain corporate excise taxes assessed against him and paid under protest. The Chancellor allowed recovery of the taxes with interest, and the Commissioner of Revenue has appealed.

There is little controversy about the facts of the case. The issues involved, however, are of great importance in the administration of the Tennessee corporate excise tax law, and also to taxpayers who may be involved in corporate liquidations, because of certain differences which exist between…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Commissioner v. Court Holding Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. United States v. Cumberland Public Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  3. Shelby County v. BardenTennessee Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Gallagher v. ButlerTennessee Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Woods Lumber Company v. MacFarlandTennessee Supreme Court · 1962

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cook Export Corp. v. KingTennessee Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Easco, Inc. v. CardwellTennessee Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Little Six Corporation v. Ruth Johnson, CommissionerCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API