Legal Opinion

People ex rel. Putzel v. Simonson

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1891Published

Application by Charles Putzel for an order to compel John Simonson, Bobert E. Babb, and Sigismond Berendsohn, inspectors of election, at an annual meeting of the stockholders of the United States Crematory Company, to hold a new election. Application denied. For former reports, see 16 H. Y. Supp. 118, and 17 H. Y. Supp. 595, mem.

1Opinion of the CourtLawbenoe, J.

This application must be denied for the reason that it nowhere appears that the corporation has had' notice of the proceedings. The general term of this department held upon the application for a mandamus that the fifteenth1 section of chapter 563 of the Laws of 1890 is simply a reenactment of the provisions of theBevised Statutes. Under the provisions of the Bevised Statutes it was held that the corporation itself should be made a party, and be served with notice of the presentation of the application to the court. See In re Pioneer Paper Co:, 36 How. Pr. 102; In re Schoharie Valley R. Co.,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re the Election of Trustees of the Pioneer Paper Co.New York Supreme Court · 1863

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API