Legal Opinion

Huested Estate

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 23, 1961No. Appeals, Nos, 212 and 213PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Bell,

Were settlor’s amendments made after 1948 to his inter vivos trust indenture created in 1946 voidable as to his widow?

On January il'5, 1940, Nevin N. Huested and the Fidelity Trust Company executed a trust indenture which reserved to the settlor the right to amend and to revoke the trust in whole or in part. The assets of the trust consisted of stocks and bonds which had a market value at his death of approximately $450,-000. Under the terms of this (original) indenture the trustee was to pay the income from the trust to Mr. Huested during his lifetime. Upon his…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Windolph v. Girard Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
  2. Henderson EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  3. Shapley TrustSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  4. McKean EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  5. Brown EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Centolanza v. Lehigh Valley Dairies, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  2. Estate of KotzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  3. Re: Trust Under Deed of D. Kulig Apl of Budke, C.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  4. Rosenblum v. GibbonsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Dauphin Deposit Trust Company v. McGinnesDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1962

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API