Legal Opinion

Appeal of Gray

United States Board of Tax Appeals

Decided September 28, 1925No. Docket No. 716PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*679OPINION.

Smith:

In each of his income-tax returns for 1918 and 1919, the taxpayer deducted from gross income for exhaustion of a patent $94,105.55. In the audit of the returns the Commissioner has disallowed so much of the claimed deduction as is in excess of $45,793.97. The Commissioner’s allowance is based on a March 1, 1913, value of the patent of $457,939.70. The taxpayer contends that the value on March 1, 1913, was from $1,250,000 to $1,500,000.

Upon the hearing of this appeal counsel for the taxpayer was asked whether, in view of the recent decisions of the Supreme Court of the United…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. FlannerySupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. McCaughn v. LudingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1925

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Kimmelman v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1979
  2. Estate of Simplot v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 1999
  3. Hooker Industries, Inc. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1982
  4. Edwards v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1959
  5. Estate of Richard R. Simplot v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1999

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API